Legal Opinion

Glover v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1951No. 6 Div. 248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

On a charge of violating a city ordinance (No. 600), prohibiting the possession of certain papers customarily or usually used in the operation of a lottery, the city was permitted to prove by one who qualified as an expert that certain papers were suitable for or customarily used in the operation of a lottery.

The Court of Appeals in the opinion here under review held such testimony was permissible. Petitioner here finds fault with that ruling upon the basis of our holding that in certain cases it is not permissible for a witness, although an expert, to testify as to his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brandon v. Progress Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. McCarthy v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Colvin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Low v. LowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Penton v. PentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Brazell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Carr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API