Colvin v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.,
We agree with the Court of Appeals that the evidence made a case for the jury. However, the Court of Appeals holds that the testimony of Fire Chief Pete Matthews was admissible, in giving his opinion that the fire was of “incendiary origin.” A fire “of incendiary origin” is, a malicious burning of property. Webster’s New International Dictionary. Hence the witness was allowed to give his opinion on the ultimate fact in issue. ' Morris v. State, 124 Ala. 44, 27 So. 336. Was this testimony competent?
We consider that Fire Chief Pete Matthews qualified as an expert. If his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . GrutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Brandon v. Progress Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Decatur Car Wheel & Manufacturing Co. v. MehaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- First Nat. Bank v. Fire Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Travis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Garrett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.