Orange Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Dykes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
COBB, Judge.
Pursuant to a timely motion for rehearing,1 we hereby withdraw our previous opinion filed on April 20, 1983, and substitute this opinion in its stead. That opinion was predicated upon the erroneous premise that the mortgage sought to be foreclosed by the plaintiff-appellant, Orange Federal Savings and Loan Association, “was executed after the banking regulation of the de *643la Cuesta2 case became effective.. . . ” In point of fact, the mortgage was executed on July 30,1976, one day prior to the effective date of the regulation.
Foreclosure in the instant case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- St. Martin v. McGeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Home Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Palm Beach v. EnglishDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- ORANGE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. DykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Abrego v. United Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- ORANGE FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N v. DykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983