Legal Opinion
Larson v. Chase Pipe Line Company
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 9, 1973No. 26044PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
The respondent pipe line company commenced two actions to condemn a pipeline right-of-way 50 feet in width across the adjoining properties of the petitioners. The matter was consolidated in the trial court, which issued an order of temporary possession. The petitioners brought an original proceeding here seeking invalidation of the order and we issued a rule to show cause why their requested relief should not be granted. We now discharge the rule.
I
The respondent company moved to dismiss the proceedings here and to vacate the order to show cause for the reason that this proceeding was not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Town of Glendale v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Thornton Development Authority v. UpahDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Akin v. Four Corners EncampmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Coquina Oil Corp. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. ShakleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.