Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Company and City of McCaysville Georgia, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge:'
The Federal Power Commission held petitioner’s request for a jurisdictional ruling in abeyance pending resolution of a border dispute. Because we find the Commission has an obligation to resolve the jurisdictional issue, we reverse.
I
In 1818, two mathematicians, James Camaek and James S. Gaines, were commissioned by Georgia and Tennessee to survey the 35th parallel north latitude in order to fix the boundary between the states.1 Had they done their job well this ease would not be before us. Due, however, to poor instruments, the Camack-Gaines line ended up roughly one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Wisconsin v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Company and City of McCaysville Georgia, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974