Legal Opinion

Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Company and City of McCaysville Georgia, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 12, 1974No. 72-1805PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge:'

The Federal Power Commission held petitioner’s request for a jurisdictional ruling in abeyance pending resolution of a border dispute. Because we find the Commission has an obligation to resolve the jurisdictional issue, we reverse.

I

In 1818, two mathematicians, James Camaek and James S. Gaines, were commissioned by Georgia and Tennessee to survey the 35th parallel north latitude in order to fix the boundary between the states.1 Had they done their job well this ease would not be before us. Due, however, to poor instruments, the Camack-Gaines line ended up roughly one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Wisconsin v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Cities Service Company and City of McCaysville Georgia, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API