Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
The Liquidators of claimant European Federal Credit Bank Limited (“Eurofed”), acting on their own behalf and on behalf of Eurofed, together with plaintiff United States have filed a joint motion seeking the Court’s approval and entry of a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“the Settlement Agreement”) that resolves Eurofed’s claims in this forfeiture action. 1 Claimant Pavel Lazarenko objects to the Settlement Agreement, and he requests an evidentiary hearing to assess whether there exists a sufficient factual basis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stephen G. Conafay, an Infant, by His Father and Next Friend Stephen R. Conafay v. Wyeth Laboratories, a Division of American Home Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Plains Growers, Inc. v. Ickes-Braun Glasshouses, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Reetz v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank JuliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.