Legal Opinion
United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 23, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2004-0798PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the emergency motion [Dkt. 538] of Claimant Pavel Lazarenko, a.k.a. Pavlo Lazarenko (“Lazarenko”), for clarification of the restraining order [Dkt. 23] in this case. Specifically, Lazarenko seeks an order that: (1) “legal action in the Royal Court of Guernsey, filed on November 3, 2015, does not violate the restraining order”; (2) that “[Lazarenko] and his agents may engage in foreign litigation to challenge the restraints on his foreign assets without violating the Court’s restraining order”;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. All Funds in Account Nos. 747.034/278, 747.009/278, & 747.714/278 Banco Espanol De CreditoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Credit SuisseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit AtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017