Legal Opinion
Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. Hord
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1885No. 12,333PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This action was instituted by the Attorney General to recover from the county of Rush divers sums, of money which from time to time it had paid for collecting and disbursing the school fund.
The Constitution requires the counties to bear the expense of protecting, investing and collecting the school fund. Whatever sums they pay to their officers for managing the fund they must account for to the State. State, ex rel., v. Board, etc., 90 Ind. 359; Vanarsdall v. State, ex rel., 65 Ind. 176, see p. 184. For money paid out of the school fund to its officers for managing the school funds, an action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Collins v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- People ex rel. Roman Catholic Orphan Asylum Society v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Moore v. State ex rel. DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Hunt v. State ex rel. EdgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- State ex rel. Hord v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Bisbee v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Sudbury v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Jones v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- School City v. Harrison School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. HordIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.