Enard v. State

OPINION

Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice

Today we address whether a defendant appealing from a judgment of conviction preserved error in the trial court by raising a complaint in a pretrial writ of habeas corpus or by objecting at the end of a hearing after pleading “guilty” and being found guilty. Concluding that appellant did not preserve error and that appellant’s counsel’s failure to preserve error did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I.- Factual and Procedural Background

In trial court' cause number 1439251, appellant John Michael Enard…