Legal Opinion

Vestal v. Morris

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1895No. 1239PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by .

Scott, J.

When this action was called for argument a motion was made by the respondents to strike appellants’ reply brief, on the ground of failure to comply with the rules and practice of the court. The original brief of appellants consists of some four or five pages, which contain little more than a statement of the cause. Certain sections of the Code are cited therein, and one case, in support of appellants’ contentions. The effect was practically to impose upon respondents the burden of presenting the entire cause here. After respondents’ brief…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington Timber & Loan Co. v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. White Pine Manufacturing Co. v. MoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Coolidge v. County of PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Woodward v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Northern Pac. R. v. GalvinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API