Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 28, 1918No. A-2779PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from,■ District Court, Garvin County; F. B. Swank, Judge. Ross Mullins was convicted of receiving stolen goods, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff in error, Ross Mullins, hereinafter called defendant, was informed against in the district court of Garvin county for the offense of “feloniously and fraudulently receiving property that had been stolen, knowing that the same had been stolen,” convicted, and sentenced to serve 18 months in the State Reformatory at Granite, Okla. The defendant’s motion for a new trial being overruled, he brings error to this court.

The uncontradicted evidence is that, among other things, a pair of boots were stolen from a store in Lindsay, in the county of Garvin, by one Searcy Hawkins; that said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RountreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  2. Hamil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Sipes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. State v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. Mason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API