Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided May 31, 1894No. 4,598PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition of Arland E. Brown and others in the suit of Samuel Thomas against the Cincinnati. New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company.

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition by Arland E. Brown and others, claiming to represent a, large majority of the men in the employ of Samuel Felton, heretofore appointed receiver herein, praying that the court direct him to modify a,n order issued by him on March. 27th, and which went into effect May 1st, of this year. The order was as follows:

“Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company, S. M. Felton,

Receiver.

“Cincinnati, March 27, 1894.
“The receiver regrets to announce to the officers and employes that, in spite of all the efforts made by the exercise of economies in every…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1894
  2. Ames v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1894
  3. Waterhouse v. ComerU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1893
  4. Continental Trust Co. v. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1894
  5. Frank v. Denver & R. G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API