Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1996No. 95-332PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

Appellant Rowdy Dane Anderson a/k/a Rowdy Dane Brock, appeals his conviction of issuing a bad check as part of a common scheme, a felony. We affirm.

The sole issue presented for review is:

Did the District Court abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of other crimes?

Background Facts

On October 14, 1994, Appellant opened a checking account with Security State Bank in Plentywood, Montana. Appellant represented to a bank employee that he would make an initial deposit of $70 into his account. However, that deposit was never made.

Appellant began to write checks the same day he opened his account.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. JustMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. MattMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. EilerMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. BroganMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KeysMontana Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MacKinnonMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HocevarMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. AyersMontana Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API