Legal Opinion
In Re Referendum No. 18, St Ques. No. 437
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 27, 1966No. 41933PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Vice Chief Justice:
There is involved here an appeal from the decision of the Secretary of State, the *296Honorable James M. Bullard, holding Referendum Petition No. 18, sufficient for submission to a vote of the people State Question No. 437.
Referendum Petition No. 18 seeks to submit to a vote of the people the question of the approval or disapproval of Plouse Bill No. 669, Title 14, § 2, O.S.Supp.1965, enacted by the 30th Legislature of the State of Oklahoma on July 21, 1965, House Bill No. 669, divides the State of Oklahoma into six congressional districts and fixes the boundaries…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pafford v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Sturdy v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Milburn v. State Taxpayers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 272, State Question No. 409Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 379Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re Referendum Petition No. 18, State Ques. No. 437Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Oklahoma's Children, Our Future, Inc. v. CoburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.