Legal Opinion
Zweifel v. Morgan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
145 N.J. Super. 35 (1976)
366 A.2d 1003
ALGER ZWEIFEL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES T. MORGAN AND WILLIAM W. ZWEIFEL, AND WILLIAM R. JUSTICE, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 27, 1976.
Decided November 12, 1976.
Before Judges CARTON, KOLE and LARNER.
Mr. William V. Eisenberg, attorney for appellant.
Messrs. Casby, Garrigle & Chierici, attorneys for respondent Zweifel.
2Per curiam
This appeal involves an interplay between the New Jersey interspousal immunity doctrine and principles of conflicts of law.
Plaintiff…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Restifo v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Wuerffel v. Westinghouse CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. PerlmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Tornquist v. PerkowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987