Legal Opinion
Fromkin v. Merrall Realty Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The agreement upon which this action is based was an oral one, claimed by plaintiffs to have been made between the plaintiff Fromkin and the defendants Schwartz and Ades, the holders of all the capital stock of the corporate plaintiff. It is also *920claimed that subsequently defendant Arbeit orally assented to be a party to the agreement. Plaintiffs assert that the agreement provided that the land belonging to Merrall, which was immediately to the east of the hotel owned and operated by the corporate plaintiff, would not be sold without the unanimous consent of said four persons (Messrs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Benintendi v. Kenton Hotel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Long Park, Inc. v. Trenton-New Brunswick Theatres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Boag v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Macklem v. Marine Park Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Isaac Arditi v. Aaron DubitzkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Sagamore Corp. v. Diamond West Energy Corporation and Howard F. BoversCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Northwood Projects, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Greenberg v. LadicorbicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ohr Somayach/Joseph Tanenbaum Educational Center v. Farleigh International LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020