Legal Opinion

Brandon Motton v. Cory Ruark, et al.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided November 20, 2025No. 4:21-cv-04093Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ROCK ISLAND DIVISION BRANDON MOTTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:21-cv-04093 ) CORY RUARK, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Plaintiff, then proceeding pro se, brought the present lawsuit pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging a Fourteenth Amendment claim for failure to protect from harm. The matter comes before this Court for ruling on the parties’ respective motions in limine, (Docs. 137, 138), and other issues related to the upcoming trial. LEGAL STANDARD FOR MOTIONS IN LIMINE A district court has broad discretion in ruling on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Hendrickson v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Lori David v. Caterpillar, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API