Legal Opinion
Tokyo Tanker Co. v. Etra Shipping Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 10, 1989PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kassal, J.
An indemnification agreement will not be read to impose obligations upon the indemnitor which are neither disclosed at the time of its execution nor reasonably within the scope of its terms and the over-all intendment of the parties at the time of its making.
Plaintiff-appellant, Tokyo Tanker Company Limited (Tokyo Tanker), commenced this action by summons and complaint dated November 19, 1986, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain fees and expenses claimed by defendants-respondents, Etra Shipping Corporation, Norop Tankers Corporation, Globtik Tankers…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Inman v. Binghamton Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority v. Tri-Delta Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Oscar Gruss & Son, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Yossie Hollander, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Bourne Co. v. MPL Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Press Am., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. STWB INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.