Legal Opinion
LeFelt v. Nasarow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 29, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
76 N.J. Super. 576 (1962)
185 A.2d 217
FLORENCE LeFELT AND REUBEN LeFELT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
WASILI NASAROW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 22, 1962.
Decided October 29, 1962.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Stalter, Doan & DeYoe, attorneys for appellant Aetna Insurance Company; Mr. James H. McLeod, attorney for appellant The Phoenix Insurance Company; Mr.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- LeFelt v. NasarowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- LeFelt v. NasarowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- United States Underwriters Ins. v. Kum Gang Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Caldwell Trucking PRP Group v. Spaulding Composites Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Northwestern Mutual Insurance v. Great American InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Trolio v. McLendonOhio Supreme Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.