Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jeffries v. Pankow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1924Published

1Dissent

COSHOW, J.,

Dissenting. — I regret that I am not able to agree with the opinion of the majority of the court. The complaint not having been demurred to, should be construed liberally in favor of the plaintiff. Every reasonable intendment should be invoked to sustain the complaint after verdict: Smith v. National Surety Co., 77 Or. 17 (149 Pac. 1040); Portland v. New England Casualty Co., 96 Or. 48 (169 Pac. 211); Weishaar v. Pendleton, 73 Or. 190 (144 Pac. 401); Minter v. Minter, 80 Or. 369 (157 Pac. 157); Winn v. Taylor, 98 Or. 556 (190 Pac. 342, 194 Pac. 857); Duby et al. v. Hicks, 105 Or.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Catlin v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Dame v. C. H. Hanson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API