Legal Opinion

Alford v. Hughes & Randolph

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

from the District Com't of the Parish of Bossier, Egan, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Büohanan, J.

Plaintiff sues for restitution of the price of a slave woman named Charlotte, who is alleged to have been afflicted with a redhibitory disease at the time of her sale by defendants to plaintiff. The petition also alleges that the disease was well known to defendants, who concealed it from plaintiff.

The defendants pleaded the general ilsue; and the cause was tried by a jury, who found a verdict for defendants.

The fact essential to the maintaining of this action, of the existence of the disease in the slave at the time of the sale, is not made out by the proof. The earliest evidence…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Givens v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Arndt v. D. H. Holmes Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Pouey v. SurleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Bonvillain v. BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API