Legal Opinion

Tupelo Hotel Co. v. Long

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1930No. 28336PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

Long was plaintiff in the court below, and sued the hotel company for a commission of one thousand six hundred dollars for services in assisting the hotel company to make a sale of its hotel building to the parties who bought it.

It appears, that one Mrs. Mother shed went to Tupelo with a view of buying the Reed Hotel in that city, which hotel was leased and being* operated by a sister of the said Mrs. Mothershed. Being a friend of Mr. Long’s, and desiring* to confer with him with reference to this purchase, she called him over the telephone, and he wen t to the hotel, and she related to him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank v. C. W. Leeton & Bro.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Metzger v. Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Allen Gravel Co. v. NixMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Meder v. Superior Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Moyse Real Estate Co. v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Partee v. PeppleMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Case v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Reynolds v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API