Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. C. W. Leeton & Bro.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22222PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

The appellant bank sued appellees upon their promissory note. The appellees pleaded failure of consideration, a violation of the so-called Blue Sky Laws of this state, and that the appellant bank was not an innocent purchaser for value. Mr. Forgéy, president of the bank, testified that he bought the note for the bank, at the bank, for a valuable consideration before maturity, and that he knew nothing about the consideration of the note. The note is dated February 11, 1920, and is made payable to Barney Thompson or order. Mr. Forgey was asked on examination if he did not know that the note…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Cotton Mills v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Loring v. BrodieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Gunster v. Scranton Illuminating, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Cook v. American Tubing & Webbing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1906
  5. First Nat. Bank of Blaine v. BlakeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Mount Vernon Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Tallahatchie Home Bank v. AldridgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  4. National Bank of Shamokin v. Waynesboro Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Gidden Motor Co. v. JohnstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API