Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stater Motor Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action on a contractor’s bond upon which the defendant company is surety. In 1931, O. D. Wolfe entered into a contract with the state, through the state highway commission, to grade 6.41 miles of the west unit of the Umatilla-Sand Station section of the Columbia River highway. The plaintiff and its assignee furnished certain repair parts and labor for the trucks used on the job, aggregating $596. Upon default in payment, action was commenced. The cause was submitted to the court without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant surety company appeals.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. NealOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Standard Boiler Works v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Multnomah County v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Columbia County v. Consolidated Contract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomlinson-Arkwright Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. International Harvester Co. v. L. G. DeFelice & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Asset Recovery Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. State v. Smith & Smith Excavation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API