In re Christensen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
R. KIMBALL MOSIER/U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
The matters before the Court are applications for compensation and reimbursement of expenses by the former chapter 7 trustee and his counsel. Because these two bankruptcy cases have the same procedural background and raise the same issue, the Court elects to deal with them together in this memorandum decision. Although applications for compensation are typically straightforward and without much controversy, the ones in these cases are different. The services the trustee and his counsel rendered, and for which they now seek…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- John Bird v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of UtahBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- In Re ChristensenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Alexander H. HyattUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Christensen v. JubberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Desmond v. EdrissiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.