Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 13, 1980No. C. A. 78-144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASSIBRY, District Judge:

The United States brought this suit on behalf of one of its agencies, the Small Business Administration (hereafter “SBA”). The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 (1976) and 28 U.S.C. § 634 (1976).

In April of 1973, Hazel and Elvin Smith received a loan from the SBA and executed a promissory note. 1 To secure the note, the Smiths gave a collateral mortgage on their home. 2 The terms of the mortgage did not waive the homestead exemption on the Smith’s home.

In 1976, the Smiths defaulted on the note, and the SBA by letter of July 2, 1976 declared the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hooter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. OUACHITA NAT. BANK IN MONROE v. RowanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Daniel v. ThigpenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacUmber v. ShaferWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API