Legal Opinion

Zauber v. Murray Savings Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1979No. 20082PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Appellant, Ray Zauber, brought this derivative action on behalf of Murray Savings Association seeking an accounting for and recovery of assets allegedly converted from Murray Savings to the use and benefit of the appellees as insiders. In the trial court appellees contended that appellant did not meet the standing requirements to bring a derivative suit for the following reasons: he had not complied with the class action requirements in rule 42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; he had not complied with the demand requirements of article 5.14(B)(2)(b) of the Texas…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Harry Lewis v. Al KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Sneed v. WebreTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Gearhart Industries, Inc. v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Quinn v. Anvil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Langston v. Eagle Publishing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API