Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Weed-Parsons Printing Co. v. Palmer

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for a writ of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtFubsman, J.

The defendant is a state officer. As such the legislature has imposed upon him certain duties. So far as concerns the present application, these are to transmit to each county clerk in the state, at least sixty days before any general election, a sufficient number of copies of the Election Law to furnish one copy to each such county clerk and one to each town, village and city clerk and each inspector of election in the county (Laws of 1892, chap. 680, § 19); to cause to he prepared a sufficient number of suitable blank books for lists and registers of voters, containing blank certificates…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Fiedler v. MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. People, Ex Rel. Smith v. . SchielleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Buck v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  4. State ex rel. Speer v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. J. B. Lyon Co. v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People ex rel. Weed-Parsons Printing Co. v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API