Legal Opinion

Grunberg v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 27, 1906No. Nos. 598-601PublishedCited by 24 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

These writs of error represent a joint indictment under section 5440 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3676], alleging a conspiracy to defraud the United States, with certain overt acts stated in the indictment in connection with certain importations alleged to have been made at the port of Boston. The parties indicted were Griinberg, Baitler, and Burman, copartners, doing business in Boston under the style of the “Glasgow Manufacturing Company,” who were the importers, Munroe, who represented the customhouse brokers, and Trafton and Shedd,. who were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Insurance Companies v. WeidesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. FalconeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Abraham L. Koolish, David F. Koolish and John B. Carnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. United States v. Mammoth Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API