Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Van Beuren

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 7, 1977No. 75-286-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoslin, J.

This is a will construction case. The plaintiffs are the trustees under the will of Mary A. van Beuren, late of Middletown. It is represented that all known parties who may have any interest in the cause have been joined as defendants. A guardian ad litem has been appointed to represent the interests of the minor defendants and the contingent interest of persons not in being, unascertained, or who might otherwise be affected by the cause. In the Superior Court the trustees and the adult defendants urged one construction of the will, the guardian another. The trial justice accepted the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Huntington Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Manufacturers National Bank of Troy, NY v. McCoySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  4. Lux v. LuxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  5. McHarg v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vigue v. John E. Fogarty Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  2. Chile v. BeckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Fleet National Bank v. MigliettaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  5. Estate of Fisher v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API