Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blades v. Wabash Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 17, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. — Mon. James D. Barnett, Judge. (1) The alleged levy of the $38.94 for the use and benefit of the special road district of Montgomery county was made without authority of law. State ex rel. v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 228. (2) The taxable value of railroad, telegraph and telephone properties in Montgomery county could only be fixed by the State Board of Equalization.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. — Mon. James D. Barnett, Judge. (1) The alleged levy of the $38.94 for the use and benefit of the special road district of Montgomery county was made without authority of law. State ex rel. v. Railroad, 195 Mo. 228. (2) The taxable value of railroad, telegraph and telephone properties in Montgomery county could only be fixed by the State Board of Equalization. Secs. 9338, 9339, 9340, 9359, 9363, R., S. 1899; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 82 Mo. 683. (3) The action of the county court at its May session, purporting to ascertain the value of all taxable…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

Action to collect railroad taxes. Prom a judgment for plaintiff in the circuit court of Montgomery county, defendant appeals.

In the year 1908 the county court of Montgomery county levied taxes for county purposes to the amount of fifty cents on the one hundred dollars valuation on the right of way and other taxable property of defendant in that county.

Defendant contends that under section 11, article 10, of the Constitution of Missouri the county court was only authorized to levy against defendant’s property forty cents on the one hundred dollars valuation for county purposes, because the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Crow v. Firemen's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Culbertson v. City of FultonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Village of WilberNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State ex rel. Burns v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Carthage v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. State Ex Rel. Jamison v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. State Ex Rel. Lane v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API