Legal Opinion

R.H. Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. Continental Manufacturing Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1984No. 13493Published

1Opinion of the Court

679 P.2d 142 (1984)

106 Idaho 342

R.H. PIERCE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING CO., INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and

Bill W. Nichols and Ramona Nichols, husband and wife; Charles Park and Billie Park, husband and wife; and Elma Lott, a divorced woman, dba Lott Enterprises, Defendants-Respondents.

CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING CO., INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant,

v.

R.H. PIERCE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Respondent.

CONTINENTAL…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estate of Maguire v. McNuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Master Builders, Inc. v. CabbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Onyx Refining Co. v. Evans Production Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1959
  4. Gurunian v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pratt v. ProutySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API