R.H. Pierce Manufacturing Corp. v. Continental Manufacturing Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
679 P.2d 142 (1984)
106 Idaho 342
R.H. PIERCE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING CO., INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and
Bill W. Nichols and Ramona Nichols, husband and wife; Charles Park and Billie Park, husband and wife; and Elma Lott, a divorced woman, dba Lott Enterprises, Defendants-Respondents.
CONTINENTAL MANUFACTURING CO., INC., an Idaho corporation, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant,
v.
R.H. PIERCE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Respondent.
CONTINENTAL…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estate of Maguire v. McNuttSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Master Builders, Inc. v. CabbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Onyx Refining Co. v. Evans Production Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1959
- Gurunian v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Pratt v. ProutySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.