Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Barker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

The record in this case recites that, on a day named, there was filed in the office of the clerk of the circuit court of the city of St. Louis a transcript from the office of Thomas Campbell, Esq., a justice of the peace within and for the city of St. Louis, in a certain cause wherein J. W. Cooper is plaintiff and Charles F. Barker is defendant. Then follows a recital of the filing of a bill of exceptions in the circuit’ court, and then the bill of exceptions itself. But the transcript nowhere, either in the bill of exceptions or out of it, embodies the statement of claim or transcript of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilliker v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Garnett v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. McQuoid v. LambMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Rankin v. FairleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rocheport Bank v. DoakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Wedeking v. McCrackenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API