Rankin v. Fairley
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court, Hon. E. L, Edwards, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion. I. Rankin and Fairley were not partners within the meaning of the law. Clifton v. Howard, 89 Mo. 192; Hewberger v. Friede, 23 Mo. App. 631; Priest v. Chouteau, 12 Mo. App. 252; Ashley v. Shaw, 82 Mo. 76; Bonnet v. Harshe, 67 Mo. 170; Musser v. Brinlc, 68 Mo. 242; s. oM 80 Mo. 350 ; Reilly v. Reilly, 14 Mo. App. 63 ; Cramer v. Bachman, 68 Mo. 310. IT.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court, Hon. E. L, Edwards, Judge. The case is stated in the opinion. I. Rankin and Fairley were not partners within the meaning of the law. Clifton v. Howard, 89 Mo. 192; Hewberger v. Friede, 23 Mo. App. 631; Priest v. Chouteau, 12 Mo. App. 252; Ashley v. Shaw, 82 Mo. 76; Bonnet v. Harshe, 67 Mo. 170; Musser v. Brinlc, 68 Mo. 242; s. oM 80 Mo. 350 ; Reilly v. Reilly, 14 Mo. App. 63 ; Cramer v. Bachman, 68 Mo. 310. IT. Rankin’s declaration that he and Fairley were partners does not make them partners, if the facts in evidence show the contrary, any more than his…
1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.
This suit was, commenced before a justice of the peace, and was taken to the circuit court *591by appeal. The following is a copy of the account sued on before the justice:
“1886. D. A. Fairley, Dr. To John H. Rankin.
April 6, to 6 days superintendent putting in oats for D. A. Fairley..............$ 6.00
July 5, to 3 hands, 11-3 day, $1.50 per day.................................. 6.75
July 9, to 3 hands, 4 days, $1.50 per day, $18.1-3.................'............ 9.00
July 9, to cutting 76 acres of oats, $1.35 per acre, $95. 1-3..................... 47.50
Total amount due Rankin..........$68.75 ”
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donnell v. HarsheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Musser v. BrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Plummer v. TrostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Campbell v. DentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Newberger v. FriedeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steckman v. Galt State BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Laney v. FickelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- Pitman v. 16 To 1 Mining Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Foskett-Kessner Feed Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Cooper v. BarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.