United States v. Lutz
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CEDARBURG, Chief Judge.
Appellant, contrary to his pleas, was found guilty at a general court-martial comprised of officer members, of one specification of oral sodomy with a child under the age of 16, 3 specifications of lascivious acts with females under the age of 16 and 2 specifications of taking indecent liberties with females under the age of 16 in violation of Articles 125 and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 934. He was acquitted of 1 specification of sodomy, and 6 specifications of lascivious acts charged under Articles 125 and 134, UCMJ. The military judge, on motion of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. Victor AngeliniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. GregoryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. GreenwaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. WilsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987