Kyocera Solar, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STOLL, Circuit Judge.
Kyocera Solar Inc. and Kyocera Mexica-na S.A. de C.V. (collectively, “Kyocera”) appeal á final determination by the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”). The CIT reviewed and affirmed the International Trade Commission’s (“Commission”) determination that the statutory text did not support Kyocera’s proposed interpretation of the statute. Because we agree that the plain meaning of the statute forecloses Kyocera’s proposed interpretation, we affirm.
Background
This case concerns solar modules (i.e., solar panels) that incorporate crystalline silicon photovoltaic (“CSPV”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Dillinger France S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Özdemir Boru San. Ve Tic. Ltd. Sti. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.