Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided November 7, 1994No. 06-94-00193-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

This is an appeal of a conviction for delivery of a controlled substance.

The appellant, Leonard Earl Baker, was convicted by a jury and assessed punishment at forty years’ confinement. He now raises three points of error: (1) that the trial court denied the defendant his United States and Texas constitutional right to due process due to the State’s failure to fully disclose all potential witnesses; (2) that the trial court denied his United States and Texas constitutional right of due process due to the State’s failure to preserve a photographic lineup, and (3) that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Werner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  2. Edwards v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  3. Garner, Naim Id-Deen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Pomrenke Mining, LLC, a Delaware Limited LiabilityUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API