Legal Opinion

Barkley v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 19, 1999No. 116, 1998PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal from the Superior Court, we are required to determine whether the automatic revocation of driving privileges that must be imposed at the time of sentencing for certain drug offenses is a direct penal consequence of a plea of guilty. The Superi- or Court ruled that the license revocation was a collateral consequence of a plea of guilty and the defendant’s awareness of that consequence was not required incident to the acceptance of the plea under the applicable Superior Court Criminal Rule. We conclude, however, that the immediate and automatic imposition of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Somerville v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Nardell U. Carter v. Daniel McCarthy Midge Carroll, John K. Van De KampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Kevin Duane Fisher IISupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Bolware v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  3. Blackwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  4. State v. BarahonaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. People v. AlcockNew York Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API