Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Steven

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 2006PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

The grant or denial of a motion for “an adjournment for any purpose is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court” (Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 283 [1984] [citations omitted]). Contrary to appellant mother’s claims, Family Court’s refusal to grant her application for an adjournment fails to constitute an abuse of discretion. Mother’s need for an adjournment to call additional witnesses resulted from her lack of due diligence in preparing for the hearing. Moreover, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Paulino v. CamachoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Aida B. v. Alfredo C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Braswell v. BraswellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Diamond v. DiamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re Kinara C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API