Legal Opinion
Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 18, 2005No. 91-0986CIVGOLDPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE EXXON’S ANSWERS AND AFFIRMATIVE. DEFENSES TO ‘ CLASS MEMBER CLAIMS, FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND FOR FURTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST EXXON CORPORATION AND ITS ATTORNEYS
GOLD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Allapattah Services Inc., et al., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and this Court’s inherent power to control the integrity of the judicial process and the conduct of the parties before it, move this Court to enter orders: (1) striking Exxon’s frivolous answers and affirma tive defenses filed in the claims administration process…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
- Raimbeault v. Accurate Machine & Tool, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Qantum Communications Corp. v. Star Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Krakowski v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bernal v. All American Investment Realty, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.