Legal Opinion

Moultrie v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 1924No. 4 Div. 973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The appellant was convicted for “aiding and abetting” the manufacture of prohibited liquors.

The state’s evidence was directed to showing that one Corley was caught at night operating a still. Appellant and another negro were near the still, appellant lying on the ground half asleep, his head resting in his hand. Earlier during the night of the raid by the officers, some of the state’s witnesses heard some one whom they did not see- cutting wood near the still. There is no dispute in the evidence that Corley was manufacturing liquor at the still.

There was evidence that defendant went to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hanson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hightower v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Glover v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Matthews v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API