Legal Opinion
O'BRIEN v. Carney
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 25, 1934No. 3975PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss a bill of complaint brought against several respondents charged with the duty of administering the Federal Emergency! Itelief Administration and the J. P. O’Connell Company, a corporation.
The motion to dismiss being in the nature of a demurrer, the right of the complainant to the relief prayed for must appear from the allegations of facts set forth in the bill of complaint.
It is alleged that the respondents connected with the Federal Emergency Relief Administration succeeded to the powers and liabilities of the State Civil Works…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Mississippi v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Louisiana v. McAdooSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States Ex Rel. Riverside Oil Co. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Harry Friend, Doing Business as Hertz Driv-Ur-Self System, Licensee v. Frederick B. Lee, Administrator, Civil Aeronautics AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Patton v. Administrator of Civil AeronauticsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
- Gary Aircraft Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- United States v. Commercial Am. Barge Line Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.