Legal Opinion
Sarah v. Heidtman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2004No. 03-2158PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James G. Sarah, a Michigan prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment, construed as a motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Sarah is an inmate at the Alger Maximum Correctional Facility. He sued Corrections Officer Heidtman, Corrections Officer Hall,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carson Lynn Brown v. Raymond G. Toombs, Warden Peter W. Vidor, Named as Pete Vidor on Complaint, Deputy Warden Ray Palmer, Adw of Custody T. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Demetrius Knuckles El Errick E. Payton-Bey Michael Vaughn v. Raymond G. Toombs, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Samuel Donald Hood II v. Samuel Donald HoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pullen v. CombsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020