Barley v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BENDER, J.:
¶ 1 Consolidated Rail Corporation (Appellant) appeals from a discovery order in Samuel H. Barley’s (Appellee) personal injury action against Appellant. The order directs Appellant to produce for deposition two of its former legal counsel, and also deems admitted one of Appellee’s Request for Admissions. Appellant claims that this Court has jurisdiction to review the order because it constitutes a collateral order under Pa.R.A.P. 313. We conclude that portions of the order satisfy the collateral order test, and that furthermore, these portions of the order constitute…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dibble v. Penn State Geisinger Clinic, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Leonard v. Latrobe Area HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Breslin v. Dickinson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Rae v. Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Rae v. Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. ShearerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. ShearerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.