People v. Mace
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*878Opinion
WISEMAN, Acting P. J.
Defendant Andrew Mace was convicted of violating Vehicle Code section 20001 for leaving the scene of a one-vehicle accident without assisting a person injured in the accident. On appeal, Mace raises various instructional errors. We hold that a driver’s knowledge that a person involved in an accident is injured gives rise to a duty to ascertain what assistance the injured person may need. We also hold that any person who is considered a “driver” for purposes of the hit-and-run statutes has a duty to render assistance to other persons in the same vehicle who are…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. PoggiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. ScofieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corenbaum v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Carter v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Corenbaum v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. Watkins CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020