Donovan v. TOWN OF EDGARTOWN, MASS.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
STEARNS, District Judge.
The motion to reconsider is DENIED. 1 Defendants miss the point entirely. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1(k) addresses one issue: whether a federal court in a diversity condemnation case is required to honor a State’s decision to have compensation fixed by a jury. (It is open to a State to consign the decision to a commission instead). If the jury right is conferred, a federal court must respect it. Rule 71.1(k) says nothing that could be construed as binding a federal court to apply a State’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Billy R. Ashley, Shaunessy R. Sylvester, Craig Crofton A/K/A Craig C. Ashley, and Leroy LambertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Commonwealth v. SicilianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.