Legal Opinion

Donovan v. TOWN OF EDGARTOWN, MASS.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 6, 2008No. Civil Action 07-10019-RGSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

STEARNS, District Judge.

The motion to reconsider is DENIED. 1 Defendants miss the point entirely. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1(k) addresses one issue: whether a federal court in a diversity condemnation case is required to honor a State’s decision to have compensation fixed by a jury. (It is open to a State to consign the decision to a commission instead). If the jury right is conferred, a federal court must respect it. Rule 71.1(k) says nothing that could be construed as binding a federal court to apply a State’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Billy R. Ashley, Shaunessy R. Sylvester, Craig Crofton A/K/A Craig C. Ashley, and Leroy LambertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. SicilianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API