Legal Opinion
DeHaan v. Marvin
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1951No. Docket 51, Calendar 45,164PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
As the result of an automobile accident on October 25, 1949, plaintiff Siebren DeHaan recovered judgment in the amount of $18,338.30 and Beatrice DeHaan recovered judgment in the amount of $2,000. Upon failure of defendants Otto Marvin and Donald Marvin to pay the judgments, garnishment proceedings were instituted against the Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange as the insurance carrier of Otto Marvin. Disclosure was made denying liability.
The facts necessary to decision are as follows: In March, 1949, defendant Otto Marvin was the .owner of an automobile. He talked with a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- American Employers' Liability Insurance v. FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Galkin v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Commercial Union Fire Insurance v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Nowell v. Titan InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Raptis v. Safeguard InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Gooden v. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Good v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.