Thompson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his jury conviction for the sale of a Schedule I controlled substance, to-wit: heroin. § 195.020, RSMo (1969). He was sentenced under the Second Offender Act to five years imprisonment, said sentence to run concurrently with the two year sentence for burglary he previously received.
On appeal, defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. It is therefore unnecessary to recite the facts surrounding the alleged sale to St. Louis County narcotics agents.
Defendant’s first point on appeal is directed to the trial court’s sustaining of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. BainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. MudgettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- State v. HeatherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. DuncanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. McCrarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BeattyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. TurnboughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. PayneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980