Legal Opinion

State v. Braden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2003No. 1999-1452PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant, David L. Braden, raises 15 propositions of law. Finding none meritorious, we affirm his convictions. We have independently weighed the aggravating circumstance in each count against the mitigating factors and compared his sentence to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. As a result, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentence of death.

{¶ 2} David L. Braden was distraught that his relationship with Denise Roberts might be ending. Roberts resided with her father, 83-year-old Ralph Heimlich, at his Columbus home. Heimlich…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API