Legal Opinion
ND Crutcher Construction Company v. Harbin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 7, 1967No. 41935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, yice Chief Justice.
Respondent contends that the award of the State Industrial Court is void because of certain procedural irregularities occurring in the trial court.
The trial judge on October 29, 1965, entered an award allowing the claimant 2½ per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to a back injury, and’ 20 per cent permanent partial disability to the right foot. All parties appealed to the Industrial. Court sitting en banc. On November 8, 1965, the trial judge, without notice to the parties, entered a corrected order allowing the same percentages of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edmonds v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Jones v. Troup-Moore & Hall Drilling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- BF Goodrich Company v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- State Highway Department v. RhineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Blackwell v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Department of Public Safety v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Reid v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Armstrong v. Netherlands Pipeline Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Snyder v. Smith Welding & FabricationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987